<pre> From tmca@ctiosz.ctio.noao.edu Tue May 28 16:59:41 2002 Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 23:16:37 -0400 (CLT) From: Tim Abbott <tmca@ctiosz.ctio.noao.edu> Reply-To: Tim Abbott <tabbott@ctio.noao.edu> To: scistaff@ctiosz.ctio.noao.edu Cc: Ramon Galvez <ramon@ctio.noao.edu>, Ricardo Schmidt <rschmidt@ctio.noao.edu>, Oscar Saa <osaa@ctio.noao.edu>, dmaturana@ctio.noao.edu Subject: Mosaic linearity test In an effort to get at least something useful out of this miserable week, I experimented with using the flat field lamps & white spot for linearity testing of the mosaic. Nonlinearities in the CCD response and changes in illumination level can never be completely separated, but the drift in illumination can be estimated by taking a series of exposures of ascending and descending interleaved exposure times. This week's data suggest that the combined variation in illumination level and detector nonlinearity is <~1% for all output amplifiers and CCD nonlinearity is probably considerably less than this. Basically, the flat field lamps appear quite stable enough for general linearity testing. Readout noise and gain match reasonably well with the numbers given on the Mosaic web pages, although there are some differences. The individual results are tabulated below: Amp Gain RON RON Nonlin Bias e/ADU ADU e % Slope (ADU) 1 2.75 2.17 5.97 ~<1% 2 2.86 3.3 9.4 ~<1% ~10 3 2.84 2.47 7.0 ~<1% ~5 4 2.30 2.2 5.06 ~<1% ~8 5 2.45 2.9 7.1 ~<1% ~10 6 2.37 4.2 10.0 ~<1% ~12 7 2.53 3.3 8.3 ~<0.8% ~15 8 2.37 2.6 6.2 ~<1% ~8 9 2.03 3.5 7.1 ~<1% ~-5 10 1.95 3.5 6.8 ~<1% ~-5 11 2.24 6.5 14.6 ~<1% ~-5 12 2.13 3.8 8.1 ~<1% ~-5 13 2.63 2.3 6.05 ~<1% ~-2 14 2.79 2.9 8.1 ~<1% ~-2 15 3.35 2.6 8.7 ~<1% ~-5 16 3.49 2.5 8.7 ~<1% ~-5 All bias frames show some degree of slope in the vertical direction away from the serial register. Comparing with the overscan (flat) and some dark images shows that this is not dark current. The first explanation that leapt to mind was that it is spurious charge -- charge introduced in the CCD by impact ionisation if the vertical clock transitions are too fast, too sharp, or too large. Chris confirms this and that it is apparently incurable. The bit biases in most ADCs are larger than I am used to, and as much as 20% or more in some cases. This is an intrinsic problem in many ADCs and its effects are impossible to predict. Generally, however, only the lower few bits are affected and any consequences will be small. A 4 sec exposure shows an anomolously low count rate, hinting at a possible problem with the shutter at short exposure times, but a subsequent sequence of exposures from 1 to 10 sec shows the shutter to behave well in this regime with a maximum shutter error of 0.01 sec (inclusive of possible illumination drift). I attach a <a href="2002-05-17-plots.tar.gz">tar file</a> within which you will find the linearity, transfer and bit-bias curves for each amplifier. Cheers, Tim -- Tim Abbott, tabbott@noao.edu, www.ctio.noao.edu/~tmca CTIO, Casilla 603, La Serena, Chile, +56 51 205200 or NOAO/CTIO, P.O. Box 26732, Tucson, AZ 85726-6732, USA, +1 520 318 8259 [ Part 2, "" Application/X-GZIP 266KB. ] [ Unable to print this part. ]