2014 - 2015 - 2016 - 2017 - 2018 - 2019 - 2020 - 2021-present

2021-Present

Refereed Publications using data from the Dark Energy Camera (DECam), Blanco Telescope, CTIO, FY21-present are available in the following ADS Public Library 

2020

Community papers:

• Andreoni et al. (2020), MNRAS, 491, 5852: Probing the extragalactic fast transient sky at minute time-scales with DECam
• Andreoni et al. (2020), ApJ, 890, 131: GROWTH on S190814bv: Deep Synoptic Limits on the Optical/Near-infrared Counterpart to a Neutron Star-Black Hole Merger
• Bonaca et al. (2020), ApJ, 889, 70: Variations in the Width, Density, and Direction of the Palomar 5 Tidal Tails
• Calamida et al. (2020), ApJ, 891, 167: The Not So Simple Stellar System Omega Cen. II. Evidence in Support of a Merging Scenario
• Chandler et al. (2020), ApJL, 892, L38: Cometary Activity Discovered on a Distant Centaur: A Nonaqueous Sublimation Mechanism
• Chen et al. (2020), ApJL, 889, L6: The Most Rapidly Declining Type I Supernova 2019bkc/ATLAS19dqr
• Cheng et al. (2020), MNRAS, 493, 4209: Optimizing automatic morphological classification of galaxies with machine learning and deep learning using Dark Energy Survey imaging
• Coppejans et al. (2020), MNRAS, ApJL, 895, L23: A Mildly Relativistic Outflow from the Energetic, Fast-rising Blue Optical Transient CSS161010 in a Dwarf Galaxy
• Coughlin et al. (2020), MNRAS, 492, 863: Implications of the search for optical counterparts during the first six months of the Advanced LIGO's and Advanced Virgo's third observing run: possible limits on the ejecta mass and binary properties
• Ebrova et al. (2020), A&A, 634, A73: NGC 4993, the shell galaxy host of GW170817: constraints on the recent galactic merger
• Fahrion et al. (2020), A&A, 634, A53: Metal-poor nuclear star clusters in two dwarf galaxies near Centaurus A suggesting formation from the in-spiraling of globular clusters
• Grado et al. (2020), MNRAS, 492, 1731: Search for the optical counterpart of the GW170814 gravitational wave event with the VLT Survey Telescope
• Hewitt et al. (2020), MNRAS, 493, 3854: Comparison of galaxy spiral arm pitch angle measurements using manual and automated techniques
• Huang et al. (2020), ApJ, 894, 78: Finding Strong Gravitational Lenses in the DESI DECam Legacy Survey
• Ji et al. (2020), ApJ, 889, 27: Detailed Abundances in the Ultra-faint Magellanic Satellites Carina II and III
• Johnston et al. (2020), MNRAS, 495, 2247: The Next Generation Fornax Survey (NGFS): VII. A MUSE view of the nuclear star clusters in Fornax dwarf galaxies
• Kasparova et al. (2020), MNRAS, 493, 5494: An excessively massive thick disc of the enormous edge-on lenticular galaxy NGC 7572
• Kawinwanichakij et al. (2020), ApJ, 892, 7: On the (Lack of) Evolution of the Stellar Mass Function of Massive Galaxies from z = 1.5 to 0.4
• Khostovan et al. (2020), MNRAS, 493, 3966: A large, deep 3 deg2 survey of Halpha, [OIII], and [OII] emitters from LAGER: constraining luminosity functions
• Kim et al. (2020), ApJ, 894, 126: Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph Integral Field Unit Spectroscopy of the Double-peaked Broad Emission Line of a Red Active Galactic Nucleus
• Kitanidis et al (2020), MNRAS, 492, 2262: Imaging systematics and clustering of DESI main targets
• Luo et al. (2020), MNRAS, 494, 3686: Characterization of optical light curves of extreme variability quasars over a ~16-yr baseline
• Markwardt et al. (2020), MNRAS, 492, 6105: Search for L5 Earth Trojans with DECam
• Martinez-Palomera et al. (2020), ApJ, 889, 113: Introducing the Search for Intermediate-mass Black Holes in Nearby Galaxies (SIBLING) Survey
• Mau et al. (2020), ApJ, 890, 136: Two Ultra-faint Milky Way Stellar Systems Discovered in Early Data from the DECam Local Volume Exploration Survey
• McCleary et al. (2020), ApJ, 893, 8: Dark Matter Distribution of Four Low-z Clusters of Galaxies
• Monteiro-Oliveira et al. (2020), MNRAS, 495, 2007: Revising the merger scenario of the galaxy cluster Abell 1644: a new gas poor structure discovered by weak gravitational lensing
• Moskowitz and Walker (2020), ApJ, 892:27: Stellar Density Profiles of Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies
• Paillassa et al. (2020), A&A, 634, A48: MAXIMASK and MAXITRACK: Two new tools for identifying contaminants in astronomical images using convolutional neural networks
• Palumbo et al. (2020), MNRAS, 494, 4730: Linking compact dwarf starburst galaxies in the RESOLVE survey to downsized blue nuggets
• Peña et al (2020), AJ, 159, 148: Asteroids' Size Distribution and Colors from HITS
• Phriksee et al. (2020), MNRAS, 491, 1643: Weak lensing analysis of CODEX clusters using dark energy camera legacy survey: mass-richness relation
• Piatti and Fernandez-Trincado, A&A, 635, A93: Pal 13: its moderately extended low-density halo and its accretion history
• Prieto et al. (2020), ApJ, 889, 100: Variable Halpha Emission in the Nebular Spectra of the Low-luminosity Type Ia SN2018cqj/ATLAS18qtd
• Reines et al. (2020), ApJ, 888, 36: A New Sample of (Wandering) Massive Black Holes in Dwarf Galaxies from High-resolution Radio Observations
• Rezaie et al. (2020), MNRAS, 495, 1613: Improving galaxy clustering measurements with deep learning: analysis of the DECaLS DR7 data
• Sherman et al. (2020), MNRAS, 491, 3318: Exploring the high-mass end of the stellar mass function of star-forming galaxies at cosmic noon
• Soraisam et al. (2020), ApJ, 892, 112: A Classification Algorithm for Time-domain Novelties in Preparation for LSST Alerts. Application to Variable Stars and Transients Detected with DECam in the Galactic Bulge
• Tanoglidis et al. (2020), MNRAS, 491, 3535: Optimizing galaxy samples for clustering measurements in photometric surveys
• Ting-Wen and Prochaska (2020), MNRAS, in press: Constraining Magnetic Fields in the Circumgalactic Medium
• Vaduvescu et al. (2020), Astronomy and Computing, 30, 100356: Mega-Archive and the EURONEAR tools for data mining world astronomical images
• Vieira et al. (2020), ApJ, 895, 96: A Deep CFHT Optical Search for a Counterpart to the Possible Neutron Star-Black Hole Merger GW190814
• Vivas et al. (2020), MNRAS, 492, 1061: A DECam view of the diffuse dwarf galaxy Crater II - Variable stars
• Young et al. (2020), MNRAS, 495, 1493: Atomic hydrogen clues to the formation of counterrotating stellar discs
• Zenteno et al. (2020), MNRAS, 495, 705: A joint SZ-X-ray-optical analysis of the dynamical state of 288 massive galaxy clusters
• Zucker et al. (2020), A&A, 633, A51: A compendium of distances to molecular clouds in the Star Formation Handbook

Papers from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Collaboration:

• Bernardinelli et al. (2020), ApJSS, 247, 32: Trans-Neptunian Objects Found in the First Four Years of the Dark Energy Survey
• Bleem et al. (2020), ApJSS, 247, 25: The SPTpol Extended Cluster Survey
• de Jaeger et al. (2020), MNRAS, 495, 4860: Studying Type II supernovae as cosmological standard candles using the Dark Energy Survey
• Drlica-Wagner et al. (2020), ApJ, 893, 47: Milky Way Satellite Census. I. The Observational Selection Function for Milky Way Satellites in DES Y3 and Pan-STARRS DR1
• Gutierrez et al. (2020), MNRAS, 496, 95: DES16C3cje: A low-luminosity, long-lived supernova
• Khain et al. (2020), AJ, 159, 133: Dynamical Classification of Trans-Neptunian Objects Detected by the Dark Energy Survey
• Lidman et al. (2020), MNRAS, 496, 19: OzDES multi-object fibre spectroscopy for the Dark Energy Survey: results and second data release
• Mawdsley et al. (2020), MNRAS, 493, 5662: Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Wide-field mass maps via forward fitting in harmonic space
• Nadler et al. (2020), ApJ, 893, 48: Milky Way Satellite Census. II. Galaxy-Halo Connection Constraints Including the Impact of the Large Magellanic Cloud
• Nord et al. (2020), MNRAS, 494, 1308: Observation and confirmation of nine strong-lensing systems in Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data
• Palmese et al. (2020), MNRAS, 493, 4591: Stellar mass as a galaxy cluster mass proxy: application to the Dark Energy Survey redMaPPer clusters
• Pursiainen et al. (2020), MNRAS, 494, 5576: The mystery of photometric twins DES17X1boj and DES16E2bjy
• Scolnic et al (2020), ApJL, 896, L13: Supernova Siblings: Assessing the Consistency of Properties of Type Ia Supernovae that Share the Same Parent Galaxies
• Smith et al. (2020), MNRAS, 494, 4426: First cosmology results using type Ia supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: the effect of host galaxy properties on supernova luminosity
• Wiseman et al. (2020), MNRAS, 495, 4040: Supernova host galaxies in the dark energy survey: I. Deep coadds, photometry, and stellar masses
• Yang et al. (2020), MNRAS, 493, 5573: Spectral variability of a sample of extreme variability quasars and implications for the Mg II broad-line region
• Yu et al. (2020), ApJSS, 246, 16: Quasar Accretion Disk Sizes from Continuum Reverberation Mapping in the DES Standard-star Fields

2019

Community Papers:

• Andreoni et al. (2019), ApJL, 881, L16:GROWTH on S190510g: DECam Observation Planning and Follow-up of a Distant Binary Neutron Star Merger Candidate
• Bait et al. (2019), MNRAS, 485, 428:Outlying Halphaemitters in SDSS IV MaNGA
• Barba et al. (2019), ApJL, 870, L24:A Sequoia in the Garden: FSR 1758—Dwarf Galaxy or Giant Globular Cluster?
• Bell et al. (2019), MNRAS, 489, 3200:The intrinsic reddening of the Magellanic Clouds as traced by background galaxies - I. The bar and outskirts of the Small Magellanic Cloud
• Belladita et al. (2019), A&A, 629, A68:An extremely X-ray weak blazar at z = 5
• Bettinelli et al. (2019), MNRAS, 487, 5862:The star formation history of the Sculptor dwarf spheroidal galaxy
• Bonaca et al. (2019), ApJL, 881, L37:Multiple Components of the Jhelum Stellar Stream
• Burke et al. (2019), MNRAS, 490, 3952:Deblending and classifying astronomical sources with Mask R-CNN deep learning
• Carrasco-Davis et al. (2019), PASP, 131, 108006:Deep Learning for Image Sequence Classification of Astronomical Events
• Chen et al. (2019), MNRAS, 484, 431:Characterizing circumgalactic gas around massive ellipticals at z ~0.4 - III. The galactic environment of a chemically pristine Lyman limit absorber
• Chang et al. (2019), MNRAS, 482, 3696:A unified analysis of four cosmic shear surveys
• Costanzi et al. (2019), MNRAS, 482, 490:Modelling projection effects in optically selected cluster catalogues
• Dame et al. (2019), MNRAS, 490, 1066:TheDECamMinute Cadence Survey II: 49 Variables but No Planetary Transits of a White Dwarf
• Dey et al. (2019), AJ, 157, 168:Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys
• Dimitriadis et al. (2019), ApJL, 870, L1:K2 Observations of SN 2018oh Reveal a Two-component Rising Light Curve for a Type Ia Supernova
• Dobie et al. ApJL, 887, L13:An ASKAP Search for a Radio Counterpart to the First High-significance Neutron Star-Black Hole Merger LIGO/Virgo S190814bv
• Dzudzar et al. (2019), MNRAS, 483, 5409:The neutral hydrogen properties of galaxies in gas-rich groups
• Dzudzar et al. (2019), MNRAS, 490, L6:Group pre-processing versus cluster ram-pressure stripping: the case of ESO156-G029
• Fan et al. (2019), ApJ, 887, 74:ALMA Reveals a Gas-rich, Maximum Starburst in the Hyperluminous, Dust-obscured Quasar W0533-3401 at z ~ 2.9
• For et al. (2019), MNRAS, 489, 5723:WALLABY early science -V. ASKAP H I imaging of the Lyon Group of Galaxies 351
• Goldstein et al. (2019), ApJL, 881, L7:GROWTH on S190426c: Real-time Search for a Counterpart to the Probable Neutron Star-Black Hole Merger using an Automated Difference Imaging Pipeline for DECam
• Heinze et al. (2019), AJ, 158, 232:The Flux Distribution and Sky Density of 25th Magnitude Main Belt Asteroids
• Hosseinzadeh et al. (2019), ApJL, 880, L4:Follow-up of the Neutron Star Bearing Gravitational-wave Candidate Events S190425z and S190426c with MMT and SOAR
• Hu et al. (2019), ApJ, 886, 90:The Ly alphaLuminosity Function and Cosmic Reionization at z ~7.0: A Tale of Two LAGER Fields
• Jewitt et al. (2019), AJ, 157, 54:Active Asteroid P/2017 S5 (ATLAS)
• Jones et al. (2019), A&A, 632, A78:Evolution of compact groups from intermediate to final stages. A case study of the H I content of HCG 16
• Joshi et al. (2019), ApJ, 887, 266:X-shaped Radio Galaxies: Optical Properties, Large-scale Environment, and Relationship to Radio Structure
• Kleiner et al. (2019), MNRAS, 488, 5352:WALLABY Early Science - IV. ASKAP H I imaging of the nearby galaxy IC 5201
• Koposov et al. (2019), MNRAS, 485, 4726:Piercing the Milky Way: an all-sky view of the Orphan Stream
• Leistedt et al. (2019), ApJ, 881, 80:Hierarchical Modeling and Statistical Calibration for Photometric Redshifts
• Li et al. (2019), ApJ, 870, 12:Photometric and Spectroscopic Properties of Type Ia Supernova 2018oh with Early Excess Emission from the Kepler 2 Observations
• Li et al. (2019), MNRAS, 490, 3508:The southern stellar stream spectroscopic survey (S5): Overview, target selection, data reduction, validation, and early science
• Marubini et al. (2019), MNRAS, 489, 3403:A new sample of southern radio galaxies: host-galaxy masses and star-formation rates
• Mau et al. (2019), ApJ, 875, 154:A Faint Halo Star Cluster Discovered in the Blanco Imaging of the Southern Sky Survey
• Moolekamp et al. (2019), MNRAS, 484, 5049:DECamsurvey for low-mass stars and substellar objects in the UCL and LCC subgroups of the Sco-Cen OB Association (SCOCENSUS)
• Muller et al. (2019), A&A, 629, A18:The dwarf galaxy satellite system of Centaurus A
• Nidever et al. (2019), ApJ, 874, 118:Exploring the Very Extended Low-surface-brightness Stellar Populations of the Large Magellanic Cloud with SMASH
• Price-Whelan et al. (2019), ApJ, 887, 19:Discovery of a Disrupting Open Cluster Far into the Milky Way Halo: A Recent Star Formation Event in the Leading Arm of the Magellanic Stream?
• Reguitti et al. (2019), MNRAS, 482, 2750:Signatures of an eruptive phase before the explosion of the peculiar core-collapse SN 2013gc
• Reynolds et al. (2019), MNRAS, 482, 3591:WALLABY early science - I. The NGC 7162 galaxy group
• Ridden-Harper et al. (2019), MNRAS, 490, 5551:Discovery of a new WZ Sagittae-type cataclysmic variable in the Kepler/K2 data
• Saha et al. (2019), ApJ, 874, 30:Mapping the Interstellar Reddening and Extinction toward Baade’s Window Using Minimum Light Colors of ab-type RR Lyrae Stars: Revelations from the De-reddened Color-Magnitude Diagrams
• Senchyna et al. (2019), MNRAS, 488, 3492:Extremely metal-poor galaxies with HST/COS: laboratories for models of low-metallicity massive stars and high-redshift galaxies
• Sheppard et al. (2019), AJ, 157, 139:A New High Perihelion Trans-Plutonian Inner Oort Cloud Object: 2015 TG387
• Shipp et al. (2019), ApJ, 885, 3:Proper Motions of Stellar Streams Discovered in the Dark Energy Survey
• Shirley et al. (2019), MNRAS, in press:HELP:A catalogue of 170 million objects, selected at 0.36—4.5 um, from 1270 deg^2of prime extragalactic fields
• Stetson et al. (2019), MNRAS, 485, 3042:Homogeneous photometry - VII. Globular clusters in the Gaia era
• Suarez et al. (2019), MNRAS, 486, 1718:System initial mass function of the 25 Ori group from planetary-mass objects to intermediate/high-mass stars
• Torrealba et al. (2019), MNRAS, in press:Nine tiny star clusters in Gaia DR1, PS1 and DES
• Torrealba et al. (2019), MNRAS, 488, 2743:The hidden giant: discovery of an enormous Galactic dwarf satellite in Gaia DR2
• Torres et al. (2019), MNRAS, 487, 2296:Constraining the nature of the accreting binary in CXOGBS J174623.5-310550
• Trujillo et al. (2019), MNRAS, 486, 1192:A distance of 13 Mpc resolves the claimed anomalies of the galaxy lacking dark matter
• Vivas et al. (2019), AJ, 157, 35:The Population of Pulsating Variable Stars in the Sextans Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy
• Walker et al. (2019), MNRAS, 490, 4121:A DECam view of the diffuse dwarf galaxy Crater II: the colour-magnitude diagram
• Whidden et al. (2019), AJ, 157, 119:Fast Algorithms for Slow Moving Asteroids: Constraints on the Distribution of Kuiper Belt Objects
• Wold et al. (2019), ApJS, 240, 5:The Spitzer-HETDEX Exploratory Large Area Survey. II. The Dark Energy Camera and Spitzer/IRAC Multiwavelength Catalog
• Yang et al. (2019), A&A, 629, A91:Evolved massive stars at low-metallicity. I. A source catalog for the Small Magellanic Cloud
• Zaritsky et al. (2019), ApJS, 240, 1:Systematically Measuring Ultra-diffuse Galaxies (SMUDGes). I. Survey Description and First Results in the Coma Galaxy Cluster and Environs
• Zheng et al. (2019), PASP, 131, 074502:Design for the First Narrowband Filter for the Dark Energy Camera: Optimizing the LAGER Survey for z~7 Galaxies
• Zucker et al. (2019), ApJ, 879, 125:A Large Catalog of Accurate Distances to Local Molecular Clouds: The Gaia DR2 Edition

Papers from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Collaboration:

• Abbott et al. (2019), MNRAS, 483, 4866:Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Measurement of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation scale in the distribution of galaxies to redshift 1.
• Abbott et al. (2019), ApJL, 872, L30:First Cosmology Results using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: Constraints on Cosmological Parameters
• Abbot et al. (2019), Physical Review D, 99, 123505:Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Constraints on extended cosmological models from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
• Abbott et al. (2019), Physical Review D, 100, 023541:Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions
• Abbott et al. (2019), Physcial Review Letters, 122, 171301:Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey
• Angus et al. (2019), MNRAS, 487, 2215:Superluminous supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey
• Banda_Huarca et al. (2019), AJ, 157, 120:Astrometry and Occultation Predictions to Trans-Neptunian and Centaur Objects Observed within the Dark Energy Survey
• Baxter et al. (2019), Physical Review D, 99, 023508:Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Methodology and projections for joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions
• Brout et al. (2019), ApJ, 874, 150:First Cosmology Results Using SNe Ia from the Dark Energy Survey: Analysis, Systematic Uncertainties, and Validation
• Brout et al. (2019), ApJ, 874, 106:First Cosmology Results Using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: Photometric Pipeline and Light-curve Data Release
• Buchs et al. (2019), MNRAS, in press:Phenotypic redshifts with self-organizing maps: A novel method to characterize redshift distributions of source galaxies for weak lensing
• Camacho et al. (2019), MNRAS, 487, 3870:Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: measurement of the galaxy angular power spectrum
• Carnero Rosell et al. (2019), MNRAS, 489, 5301:Brown dwarf census with the Dark Energy Survey year 3 data and the thin disc scale height of early L types
• Constanzi et al. (2019), MNRAS, 488, 4779:Methods for cluster cosmology and application to the SDSS in preparation for DES Year 1 release
• Crocce et al. (2019), MNRAS, 482, 2807:Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: galaxy sample for BAO measurement
• Doctor et al. (2019), ApJL, 873, L24:A Search for Optical Emission from Binary Black Hole Merger GW170814 with theDarkEnergyCamera
• Dominguez-Sanchez et al. (2019), MNRAS, 484, 93:Transfer learning for galaxy morphology from one survey to another
• Fang et al. (2019), MNRAS, 490, 3573:Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: the relationship between mass and light around cosmic voids
• Farahi et al. (2019), MNRAS,Mass variance from archival X-ray properties of Dark Energy Survey Year-1 galaxy clusters
• Gruen et al. (2019), MNRAS, 488, 4389:Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: the effect of intracluster light on photometric redshifts for weak gravitational lensing
• Guarnieri et al. (2019), MNRAS, 483, 3060:Candidate massive galaxies at z ~ 4 in the Dark Energy Survey
• Hinton et al. (2019), ApJ, 876, 15:Steve:A Hierarchical Bayesian Model for Supernova Cosmology
• Hoormann et al. (2019), MNRAS, 487, 3650:C IV black hole mass measurements with the Australian Dark Energy Survey (OzDES)
• Jacobs et al. (2019), MNRAS, 484, 5330:Finding high-redshift strong lenses in DES using convolutional neural networks
• Kessler et al. (2019), MNRAS, 485, 1171:First cosmology results using Type Ia supernova from the Dark Energy Survey: simulations to correct supernova distance biases
• Klein et al. (2019), MNRAS, 488, 739:A new RASS galaxy cluster catalogue with low contamination extending to z~1 in the DES overlap region
• Kovacs et al. (2019), MNRAS, 484, 5267:More out of less: an excess integrated Sachs-Wolfe signal from supervoids mapped out by the Dark Energy Survey
• Lasker et al. (2019), MNRAS, 485, 5329:First cosmology results using Type IA supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: effects of chromatic corrections to supernova photometry on measurements of cosmological parameters
• Lee et al. (2019), MNRAS, 489, 2887:Producing a BOSS CMASS sample with DES imaging
• Lin et al. (2019), Icarus, 321, 426:Evidence for color dichotomy in the primordial Neptunian Trojan population
• Macaulay et al. (2019), MNRAS, 486, 2184:First cosmological results using Type Ia supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: measurement of the Hubble constant
• Martí­nez-Vázquez et al. (2019), MNRAS, 490, 2183:Search for RR Lyrae stars in DES ultra-faint systems: Grus I, Kim 2, Phoenix II, and Grus II
• McClintock et al. (2019), MNRAS, 482, 1352:Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: weak lensing mass calibration of redMaPPer galaxy clusters
• Morgan et al. (2019), ApJ, 883, 125:A DECam Search for Explosive Optical Transients Associated with IceCube Neutrino Alerts
• Omori et al. (2019), Physics Review D, 100, 043517:Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-correlation between Dark Energy Survey Y1 galaxy weak lensing and South Pole Telescope+P l a n c k CMB weak lensing
• Omori et al. (2019), Physics Review D, 100, 043501:Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Tomographic cross-correlations between Dark Energy Survey galaxies and CMB lensing from South Pole Telescope +Planck
• Pandey et al. (2019), Physics Review D, 100, 063519:Constraints on the redshift evolution of astrophysical feedback with Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect cross-correlations
• Pollina et al. (2019), MNRAS, 487, 2836:On the relative bias of void tracers in the Dark Energy Survey
• Pratt et al. (2019), MNRAS, 487, 1363:Cosmological lensing ratios with DES Y1, SPT, and Planck
• Raghunathan et al. (2019), ApJ, 872, 170:Mass Calibration of Optically Selected DES Clusters Using a Measurement of CMB-cluster Lensing with SPTpol Data
• Raghunathan et al. (2019), Physics Review Letters, 123, 181301:Detection of CMB-Cluster Lensing using Polarization Data from SPTpol
• Reed et al. (2019), MNRAS, 487, 1874:Three new VHS-DES quasars at 6.7 6.5
• Salvador et al. (2019), MNRAS, 482, 1435:Measuring linear and non-linear galaxy bias using counts-in-cells in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
• Samuroff et al. (2019), MNRAS, in press:Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Intrinsic Alignments and their Colour Dependence from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
• Shin et al. (2019), MNRAS, 487, 2900:Measurement of the splashback feature around SZ-selected Galaxy clusters with DES, SPT, and ACT
• Sluse et al. (2019), MNRAS, in press:H0LiCOW X. Spectroscopic/imaging survey and galaxy-group identification around the strong gravitational lens system WFI 2033-4723
• Soares-Santos et al. (2019), ApJL, 876, L7:First Measurement of the Hubble Constant from aDarkStandard Siren using the Dark Energy SurveyGalaxies and the LIGO/Virgo Binary–Black-hole Merger GW170814
• Stern et al. (2019), MNRAS, 485, 69:Weak-lensing analysis of SPT-selected galaxy clusters usingDarkEnergySurveyScience Verification data
• Stringer et al. (2019), AJ, 158, 16:Identification of RR Lyrae Stars in Multiband, Sparsely Sampled Data from the Dark Energy Survey Using Template Fitting and Random Forest Classification
• Varga et al. (2019), MNRAS, 489, 2511:Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: validation of weak lensing cluster member contamination estimates from P(z) decomposition
• Wang et al. (2019), ApJL, 875, L13:Rediscovery of the Sixth Star Cluster in the Fornax Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy
• Wang et al. (2019), ApJ, 881, 118:The Morphology and Structure of Stellar Populations in the Fornax Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy from Dark Energy Survey Data
• Zhang et al. (2019), MNRAS, 488, 1:Galaxies in X-ray selected clusters and groups in Dark Energy Survey data - II. Hierarchical Bayesian modelling of the red-sequence galaxy luminosity function
• Zhang et al. (2019), ApJ, 874, 165:DarkEnergySurveyYear 1 Results: Detection of Intracluster Light at Redshift0.25
• Zhang et al. (2019), MNRAS, 487, 2578:Dark Energy Surveyed Year 1 results: calibration of cluster mis-centring in the redMaPPer catalogues

2018

Community papers:

• Bhandari et al. (2018), MNRAS, 475, 1427:The SUrvey for Pulsars and Extragalactic Radio Bursts - II. New FRB discoveries and their follow-up
• Butler et al (2018), A&A, 620, A3:The XXL Survey. XVIII. ATCA 2.1 GHz radio source catalogue and source counts for the XXL-South field
• Butler et al (2018), A&A, 620, A16:The XXL Survey. XXXI. Classification and host galaxy properties of 2.1 GHz ATCA XXL-S radio sources
• Carballo-Bello et al. (2018), MNRAS, 474, 683:Tails and streams around the Galactic globular clusters NGC 1851, NGC 1904, NGC 2298 and NGC 2808
• Chandler et al. (2018), PASP, 130, 114502:SAFARI: Searching Asteroids for Activity Revealing Indicators
• Chiappetti et al. (2018), Astronomy & Astrophyscis:The XXL Survey: XXVII. The 3XLSS point source catalogue
• Choi et al. (2018), ApJ, 869, 125:SMASHing the LMC: Mapping a Ring-like Stellar Overdensity in the LMC Disk
• Choi et al (2018), Apj, 866, 90:SMASHing the LMC: A Tidally Induced Warp in the Outer LMC and a Large-scale Reddening Map
• Circuendez et al. (2018), A&A, 609, 53:Tracing the stellar component of low surface brightness Milky Way dwarf galaxies to their outskirts. I. Sextans
• Circuendez & Battaglia, MNRAS, 480, 251:Appearances can be deceiving: clear signs of accretion in the seemingly ordinary Sextans dSph
• Cowperthwaite et al. (2018), ApJ, 858, 18:An Empirical Study of Contamination in Deep, Rapid, and Wide-field Optical Follow-up of Gravitational Wave Events
• Dhawan et al. (2018), MNRAS 480, 1445:iPTF16abc and the population of Type Ia supernovae: comparing the photospheric, transitional, and nebular phases
• Eigenthaler et al. (2018), ApJ, 855, 142:The Next Generation Fornax Survey (NGFS). II. The Central Dwarf Galaxy Population
• Favole et al. (2018), MNRAS, 480, 1415:The mass-size relation of luminous red galaxies from BOSS and DECaLS
• Forster et al. (2018), Nature Astronomy, in press:The delay of shock breakout due to circumstellar material evident in most type II supernovae
• Gao et al. (2018), ApJ, 869, 15:Mass-Metallicity Relation and Fundamental Metallicity Relation of Metal-poor Star-forming Galaxies at 0.6
• Garling et al. (2018), ApJ, 852, 44:Mapping the Tidal Destruction of the Hercules Dwarf: A Wide-field DECamImaging Search for RR Lyrae Stars
• Gonzalez et al. (2018), Astronomy & Computing, 25, 103:Galaxy detection and identification using deep learning and data augmentation
• Holman et al. (2018), ApJ, 855, L6:A Dwarf Planet Class Object in the 21:5 Resonance with Neptune
• Hood et al. (2018), ApJ, 857, 144:The Origin of Faint Tidal Features around Galaxies in the RESOLVE Survey
• Jethwa et al. (2018), MNRAS, 480, 5342:Discovery of a thin stellar stream in the SLAMS survey
• Kerzendorf et al. (2018), MNRAS, 479, 192:A search for a surviving companion in SN 1006
• Koposov et al. (2018), MNRAS, 479, 5343:Snake in the Clouds: a new nearby dwarf galaxy in the Magellanic bridge
• Kuzma et al. (2018), MNRAS, 473, 2881:The outer envelopes of globular clusters. II. NGC 1851, NGC 5824 and NGC 1261
• Lan et al (2018), ApJ, 866, 36:The Circumgalactic Medium of eBOSS Emission Line Galaxies: Signatures of Galactic Outflows in Gas Distribution and Kinematics
• Li et al. (2018), ApJ, 861, 6:The Ensemble Photometric Variability of Over 10^5 Quasars in the Dark Energy Camera Legacy Survey and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
• Mackey et al. (2018), ApJL, 858, L21:Substructures and Tidal Distortions in the Magellanic Stellar Periphery
• Martinez-Palomera (2018), AJ, 156, 186:The High Cadence Transit Survey (HiTS): Compilation and Characterization of Light-curve Catalogs
• Medina et al. (2018), ApJ, 855, 43:Discovery of Distant RR Lyrae Stars in the Milky Way Using DECam
• Minniti et al. (2018), ApJ, 866, 12:Confirmation of a New Metal-poor Globular Cluster in the Galactic Bulge
• Muñoz et al. (2018), ApJ, 860, 65:A MegaCam Survey of Outer Halo Satellites. I. Description of the Survey
• Muñoz et al. (2018), ApJ, 860, 66:A MegaCam Survey of Outer Halo Satellites. III. Photometric and Structural Parameters
• Nidever et al. (2018), AJ, 156, 131:First Data Release of the All-sky NOAO Source Catalog
• Ordenes-Briceño et al. (2018), ApJ, 859, 52:The Next Generation Fornax Survey (NGFS). III. Revealing the Spatial Substructure of the Dwarf Galaxy Population Inside Half of Fornax's Virial Radius
• Ordenes-Briceño et al. (2018), ApJ, 860, 4:The Next Generation Fornax Survey (NGFS). IV. Mass and Age Bimodality of Nuclear Clusters in the Fornax Core Region
• Peña et al. (2018), AJ, 155, 135:Asteroids in the High Cadence Transient Survey
• Piatti et al. (2018), MNRAS, 473, 105:Star cluster formation history along the minor axis of the Large Magellanic Cloud
• Piatti & Mackey (2018), MNRAS, 478, 2164:Evidence of differential tidal effects in the old globular cluster population of the Large Magellanic Cloud
• Plionis et al. (2018), A&A, 620, A17:The XXL Survey. XXXII. Spatial clustering of the XXL-S AGN
• Pota et al. (2018), MNRAS, 481, 1744:The Fornax Cluster VLT Spectroscopic Survey - I. VIMOS spectroscopy of compact stellar systems in the Fornax core region
• Ramirez-Moreta et al. (2018), A&A, 619, A163:Unveiling the environment and faint features of the isolated galaxy CIG 96 with deep optical and HI observations
• Ross et al. (2018), MNRAS, in press:A new physical interpretation of optical and infrared variability in quasars
• Schlafly et al. (2018), ApJSS, 234, 39:The DECamPlane Survey: Optical Photometry of Two Billion Objects in the Southern Galactic Plane
• Smith et al. (2018), MNRAS, 480, 1466:Light echoes from the plateau in Eta Carinae's Great Eruption reveal a two-stage shock-powered event
• Stevans et al. (2018), ApJ, 863, 63:Bridging Star-forming Galaxy and AGN Ultraviolet Luminosity Functions at z = 4 with the SHELA Wide-field Survey
• Taylor et al (2018), ApJL, 867, L15:A Collection of New Dwarf Galaxies in NGC 5128's Western Halo
• Torrealba et al. (2018), MNRAS, 475, 5085:Discovery of two neighbouring satellites in the Carina constellation with MagLiteS

Dark Energy Survey Collaboration papers:

• Abbott et al. (2018), MNRAS, in press:Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: A Precise H0Estimate from DES Y1, BAO, and D/H Data
• Abbott et al. (2018), ApJS, 239, 18:The Dark Energy Survey: Data Release 1
• Abbott et al. (2018), Physical Review D, 98, 043526:Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
• Agnello et al. (2018), MNRAS, 479, 4345:DES meets Gaia: discovery of strongly lensed quasars from a multiplet search
• Anguita et al. (2018), MNRAS, in press:The STRong lensing Insights into the Dark Energy Survey(STRIDES) 2016 follow-up campaign. II. New quasar lenses from double component fitting
• Avila et al. (2018), MNRAS, 479, 94:Dark Energy SurveyYear-1 results: galaxy mock catalogues for BAO
• Baxter et al. (2018), MNRAS, 476, 2674:A measurement of CMB cluster lensing with SPT and DES year 1 data
• Becker et al. (2018), AJ, 156, 81:Discovery and Dynamical Analysis of an Extreme Trans-Neptunian Object with a High Orbital Inclination
• Bernstein et al. (2018), PASP, 130, 054501:Photometric Characterization of the Dark Energy Camera
• Burke et al. (2018), AJ, 155, 41:Forward Global Photometric Calibration of the Dark Energy Survey
• Cawthon et al. (2018), MNRAS, 481, 2427:Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: calibration of redMaGiC redshift distributions in DES and SDSS from cross-correlations
• Chan et al. (2018), MNRAS, 480, 3031:BAO from angular clustering: optimization and mitigation of theoretical systematics
• Chang et al. (2018), MNRAS, 475, 3165:Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: curved-sky weak lensing mass map
• Chang et al. (2018), ApJ, 864, 83:The Splashback Feature around DES Galaxy Clusters: Galaxy Density and Weak Lensing Profiles
• Chiu et al. (2018), MNRAS, 478, 3072:Baryon content in a sample of 91 galaxy clusters selected by the South Pole Telescope at 0.2
• Courbin et al. (2018), A&A, 609, 71:COSMOGRAIL: the COSmological MOnitoring of GRAvItational Lenses. XVI. Time delays for the quadruply imaged quasar DES J0408-5354 with high-cadence photometric monitoring
• Davis et al. (2018), MNRAS, 477, 2196:Cross-correlation redshift calibration without spectroscopic calibration samples in DES Science Verification Data
• Drlica-Wagner et al. (2108), ApJS, 235, 33:Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
• Elvin-Poole et al. (2018), Physical Review D, 98, 042006:Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Galaxy clustering for combined probes
• Erkal et al. (2018), MNRAS, 481, 3148:Modelling the Tucana III stream - a close passage with the LMC
• Fausti Neto et al. (2018), Astronomy & Computing, 24, 52:DES science portal: Creating science-ready catalogs
• Friedrich et al. (2018), Physical Review D, 98, 023508:Density split statistics: Joint model of counts and lensing in cells
• Garcia-Fernandez et al. (2018), MNRAS, 476, 1071:Weak lensing magnification in the Dark Energy SurveyScience Verification data
• Gatti et al. (2018), MNRAS, 477, 1664:Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: cross-correlation redshifts - methods and systematics characterization
• Gruen et al. (2018), Physical Review D, 98, 023507:Density split statistics: Cosmological constraints from counts and lensing in cells in DES Y1 and SDSS data
• Gschwend et al. (2018), Astronomy & Computing, 25, 58:DES science portal: Computing photometric redshifts
• Hoyle et al. (2108), MNRAS, 478, 592:Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: redshift distributions of the weak-lensing source galaxies
• Jeffrey et al. (2018), MNRAS, 479, 2871:Improving weak lensing mass map reconstructions using Gaussian and sparsity priors: application to DES SV
• Klein et al. (2018), MNRAS, 474, 3324:A multicomponent matched filter cluster confirmation tool for eROSITA: initial application to the RASS and DES-SV data sets
• Khain et al. (2018), AJ, 156, 273:Dynamical Analysis of Three Distant Trans-Neptunian Objects with Similar Orbits
• Li et al. (2018), ApJ, 866, 22:The First Tidally Disrupted Ultra-faint Dwarf Galaxy?: A Spectroscopic Analysis of the Tucana III Stream
• Luque et al. (2018), MNRAS, 478, 2006:Deep SOAR follow-up photometry of two Milky Way outer-halo companions discovered with Dark Energy Survey
• MacCrann et al. (2018), MNRAS, in press:DES Y1 Results: Validating cosmological parameter estimation using simulated Dark Energy Surveys
• Morganson et al. (2018), PASP, 130, 074501:The Dark Energy Survey Image Processing Pipeline
• Mudd et al. (2018), ApJ, 862, 123:Quasar Accretion Disk Sizes from Continuum Reverberation Mapping from the Dark Energy Survey
• Nagasawa et al. (2018), ApJ, 852, 99:Chemical Abundance Analysis of Three alpha-poor, Metal-poor Stars in the Ultrafaint Dwarf Galaxy Horologium I
• Prat et al. (2018), MNRAS, 473, 1667:Galaxy bias from galaxy-galaxy lensing in the DES science verification data
• Prat et al. (2018), Physical Review D, 98, 042005:Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Galaxy-galaxy lensing
• Pursiainen et al. (2018), MNRAS, 481, 849:Rapidly evolving transients in the Dark Energy Survey
• Rumbaugh et al. (2018), MNRAS, 473, 1667:Extreme Variability Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the Dark Energy Survey
• Samuroff et al. (2018), MNRAS, 475, 4524:Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: the impact of galaxy neighbours on weak lensing cosmology with IM3SHAPE
• Sevilla-Noarbe et al. (2018), MNRAS, 481, 5451:Star-galaxy classification in the Dark Energy Survey Y1 data set
• Shipp et al. (2018), ApJ, 862, 114:Stellar Streams Discovered in the Dark Energy Survey
• Smith et al. (2018), ApJ, 854, 37:Studying the Ultraviolet Spectrum of the First Spectroscopically Confirmed Supernova at Redshift Two
• Tarsitano et al. (2018), MNRAS, 481, 2018:A catalogue of Structural And Morphological Measurements for DES Y1
• Treu et al. (2018), MNRAS, 481, 1041:The STRong lensing Insights into the Dark Energy Survey (STRIDES) 2016 follow-up campaign - I. Overview and classification of candidates selected by two techniques
• Troxel et al. (2018), Physical Review D, 98, 043528:Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear
• Troxel et al. (2018), MNRAS, 479, 4998:Surveygeometry and the internal consistency of recent cosmic shear measurements
• Wethers et al. (2018), MNRAS, 475, 3682:UV-luminous, star-forming hosts of z~2 reddened quasars in the Dark Energy Survey
• Zuntz et al. (2018), MNRAS, 481, 1149:Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: weak lensing shape catalogues

2017

Community papers:

• Abbott et al. (2017), PASA, 34, id.e012:Superluminous Supernovae at High Redshift
• Andreoni et al. (2017), PASA, 34, id.e037:Mary, a Pipeline to Aid Discovery of Optical Transients
• Cabrera-Vives et al. (2017), ApJ, 836, 97 :Deep-HiTS: Rotation Invariant Convolutional Neural Network for Transient Detection
• Calamida et al. (2017), AJ, 153, 175:The not so simple globular cluster Omega Cen. I. Spatial distribution of the multiple stellar populations
• Erkal et al. (2017), MNRAS, 470, 60:A sharper view of Pal 5's tails: discovery of stream perturbations with a novel non-parametric technique
• Johnson et al. (2017), MNRAS, 466, 129:CXOGBS J174954.5-294335: a new deeply eclipsing intermediate polar
• Mackey et al. (2017), MNRAS, 472, 2975:Structured star formation in the Magellanic inter-Cloud region
• Medina et al (2017), ApJL, 845, L10:Serendipitous Discovery of RR Lyrae Stars in the Leo V Ultra-faint Galaxy
• Monteiro-Oliveira et al. (2017), MNRAS, 468, 4566:Weak lensing and spectroscopic analysis of the nearby dissociative merging galaxy cluster Abell 3376
• Muller et al. (2017), A&A, 497, id.A7:New low surface brightness dwarf galaxies in the Centaurus group
• Myeong et al. (2017), ApJL, 840, L25:Tidal tails around the outer halo globular clusters Eridanus and Palomar 15
• Nidever et al. (2017), AJ, 154, 199:SMASH: Survey of the MAgellanic Stellar History
• Piatti (2017), ApJL, 834, L14:Stellar Cluster Candidates Discovered in the Magellanic System
• Raichoor et al. (2017), MNRAS, 471, 3955:The SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: final emission line galaxy target selection
• Shiet al. (2017), ApJ, 846, 26:Deep Imaging of the HCG 95 Field. I. Ultra-diffuse Galaxies
• Suyu et al. (2017), MNRAS, 468, 2590:H0LiCOW - I. H0 Lenses in COSMOGRAIL's Wellspring: program overview
• Taylor et al. (2017), MNRAS, 469, 3444:The Survey of Centaurus A's Baryonic Structures (SCABS) - II. The extended globular cluster system of NGC 5128 and its nearby environment
• Trilling et al. (2017), AJ, 154, 170:The size distribution of Near Earth Objects larger than 10 meters
• Vivas et al. (2017), AJ, 154, 85:Absolute Magnitudes and Colors of RR Lyrae stars in DECam Passbands from Photometry of the Globular Cluster M5
• Vohl et al. (2017), PASA, 34,id.e038:Enabling Near Real-Time Remote Search for Fast Transient Events with Lossy Data Compression
• Wang et al. (2017), ApJ, 839, id.27:First Discoveries of z > 6 Quasars with the DECam Legacy Survey and UKIRT Hemisphere Survey
• Zheng et al (2017), ApJL, 842, L22:First Results from the Lyman Alpha Galaxies in the Epoch of Reionization (LAGER) Survey: Cosmological Reionization at z ∼ 7

Dark Energy Survey Collaboration papers:

• Agnello et al. (2017), MNRAS, 472, 4038:Models of the strongly lensed quasar DES J0408-5354
• Bernstein et al. (2017), PASP, 129, pp. 074503:Astrometric Calibration and Performance of the Dark Energy Camera
• Berstein et al. (2017), PASP, 129, pp. 114502:Instrumental response model and detrending for the Dark Energy Camera
• Bufanda et al. (2017), MNRAS, 465, 2531:The evolution of active galactic nuclei in clusters of galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey
• Childress et al. (2017), MNRAS, 472, 273:OzDES multifibre spectroscopy for the Dark Energy Survey: 3-yr results and first data release
• Clampitt et al. (2017), MNRAS, 465, 4204:Galaxy-galaxy lensing in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
• Clerkin et al. (2017), MNRAS, 466, 1444:Testing the lognormality of the galaxy and weak lensing convergence distributions from Dark Energy Survey maps
• Cowperthwaite et al. (2017), ApJL, 848, L17:The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. II. UV, Optical, and Near-infrared Light Curves and Comparison to Kilonova Models
• Diehl et al. (2017), ApJS, 232, 15:The DES Bright Arcs Survey: Hundreds of Candidate Strongly Lensed Galaxy Systems from the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification and Year 1 Observations
• Doctor et al. (2017), ApJ, 837, id.57:A Search for Kilonovae in the Dark Energy Survey
• Etherington et al. (2017), MNRAS, 466, 228:Environmental dependence of the galaxy stellar mass function in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification Data
• Gerdes et al. (2017), ApJL, 839, id.L15:Discovery and Physical Characterization of a Large Scattered Disk Object at 92 au
• Henning et al. (2017), MNRAS, 467, 4015:Galaxy populations in massive galaxy clusters to z = 1.1: colour distribution, concentration, halo occupation number and red sequence fraction
• Jouvel et al. (2017), MNRAS, 469, 2771:Photometric redshifts and clustering of emission line galaxies selected jointly by DES and eBOSS
• Kovacs et al. (2017), MNRAS, 465, 4166:Imprint of DES superstructures on the cosmic microwave background
• Kwan et al. (2017), MNRAS, 464, 4045:Cosmology from large-scale galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing with Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
• Lin et al. (2017), ApJL, 838, id.L15:Discovery of the Lensed Quasar System DES J0408-5354
• Luque et al. (2017), MNRAS, 468, 97:The Dark Energy Survey view of the Sagittarius stream: discovery of two faint stellar system candidates
• MacCrann et al. (2017), MNRAS, 465, 2567:Inference from the small scales of cosmic shear with current and future Dark Energy Survey data
• Melchior et al. (2017), MNRAS, 469, 4899:Weak-lensing mass calibration of redMaPPer galaxy clusters in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
• Mudd et al. (2017), MNRAS, 468, 3682:Discovery of a z = 0.65 post-starburst BAL quasar in the DES supernova fields
• Ostrovski et al. (2017), MNRAS, 465, 4325:VDES J2325-5229 a z = 2.7 gravitationally lensed quasar discovered using morphology-independent supervised machine learning
• Palmese et al. (2017), ApJL, 849, L34:Evidence for Dynamically Driven Formation of the GW170817 Neutron Star Binary in NGC 4993
• Pan et al. (2017), MNRAS, 470, 4271:DES15E2mlf: A Spectroscopically Confirmed Superluminous Supernova that Exploded 3.5 Gyr After the Big Bang
• Pieres et al. (2017), MNRAS, 468, 1349:A stellar overdensity associated with the Small Magellanic Cloud
• Reed et al. (2017), MNRAS, 468, 4702:Eight new luminous z ≥ 6 quasars discovered via SED model fitting of VISTA, WISE and Dark Energy Survey Year 1 observations
• Sánchez et al. (2017), MNRAS, 465, 746:Cosmic voids and void lensing in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
• Saro et al. (2017), MNRAS, 468, 3347:Optical-SZE scaling relations for DES optically selected clusters within the SPT-SZ Survey
• Soares-Santos et al. (2017), ApJL, 848, L16:The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. I. Discovery of the Optical Counterpart Using the Dark Energy Camera
• Tie et al. (2017), AJ, 153, id.107:A Study of Quasar Selection in the Supernova Fields of the Dark Energy Survey

2016

Community papers:

• Belardi et al. (2016), MNRAS, 462, 2506:The DECam minute cadence survey - I
• Belokurov & Koposov (2016), MNRAS, 456, 602:Stellar streams around the Magellanic Clouds
• Bettinelli et al. (2016), MNRAS, 461, L67:The Canarias Einstein Ring: a Newly Discovered Optical Einstein Ring
• Britt et al. (2016), MNRAS, 460, 2822:Discovery of a long-lived, high-amplitude dusty infrared transient
• Bruderer et al. (2016), ApJ, 817, 25:Calibrated Ultra Fast Image Simulations for the Dark Energy Survey
• Chen et al. (2016), ApJL, 827, L24:Discovery of a New Retrograde Trans-Neptunian Object: Hint of a Common Orbital Plane for Low Semimajor Axis, High-inclination TNOs and Centaurs
• Drlica-Wagner et al. (2016), ApJ, 833, L5:An Ultra-faint Galaxy Candidate Discovered in Early Data from the Magellanic Satellites Survey
• Forster et al. (2016), ApJ, 832, 155:The High Cadence Transient Survey (HITS). I. Survey Design and Supernova Shock Breakout Constraints
• Fotopoulou et al. (2016), A&A, 592, A5:The XXL Survey. VI. The 1000 brightest X-ray point sources
• Hargis et al. (2016), ApJ, 818, 39:Evidence That Hydra I is a Tidally Disrupting Milky Way Dwarf Galaxy
• Kim et al. (2016), ApJ, 820, 119:KIM 3: An Ultra-faint Star Cluster in the Constellation of Centaurus
• Kuzma et al (2016), MNRAS, 461, 3639:The outer envelopes of globular clusters - I. NGC 7089 (M2)
• Lavoie et al. (2016), MNRAS, in press:The XXL survey XV: Evidence for dry merger driven BCG growth in XXL-100-GC X-ray clusters
• Lee, Chien-Hsiu (2016), MNRAS, 462, 3006:A closer look at the Canarias Einstein ring
• Leloudas et al. (2016), Nature Astronomy, 1, 2:The superluminous transient ASASSN-15lh as a tidal disruption event from a Kerr black hole
• Mackey et al. (2016), MNRAS, 459, 239:A 10 kpc stellar substructure at the edge of the Large Magellanic Cloud: perturbed outer disc or evidence for tidal stripping?
• Martin et al. (2016), ApJL, 830, L10:SMASH 1: A Very Faint Globular Cluster Disrupting in the Outer Reaches of the LMC?
• Nugent et al (2016), AJ, 152, id.63:NEOWISE Reactivation Mission Year Two: Asteroid Diameters and Albedos
• Papovich et al (2016), ApJSS, 224, id.28:The Spitzer-HETDEX Exploratory Large-area Survey
• Roderick et al. (2016), MNRAS, 460, 30:Structural analysis of the Sextans dwarf spheroidal galaxy
• Roderick et al. (2016), MNRAS, 461, 3702:Extended stellar substructure surrounding the Boötes I dwarf spheroidal galaxy
• Sheppard et al. (2016), ApJL, 825, L13:Beyond the Kuiper Belt Edge: New High Perihelion Trans-Neptunian Objects with Moderate Semimajor Axes and Eccentricities
• Sheppard & Trujillo (2016), AJ, 152, id.221:New Extreme Trans-Neptunian Objects: Toward a Super-Earth in the Outer Solar System
• Vivas et al. (2016), AJ, 151, 118:Variable stars in the field of the Hydra II ultra-faint dwarf galaxy

Dark Enery Survey Collaboration papers:

• Abbott et al. (2016), MNRAS, 460, 1270:The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview
• Abbott et al. (2016), Physical Review D, 94, id.022001:Cosmology from cosmic shear with Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
• Annis et al. (2016), ApJL, 823, L34:A Dark Energy Camera Search for Missing Supergiants in the LMC after the Advanced LIGO Gravitational-wave Event GW150914
• Balbinot et al. (2016), ApJ, 820, 58:The Phoenix stream: a cold stream in the Southern hemisphere
• Baxter et al. (2016), MNRAS, 461, 4099:Joint measurement of lensing-galaxy correlations using SPT and DES SV data
• Becker et al. (2016), Physical Review D, 94, id.022002:Cosmic shear measurements with Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
• Chang et al. (2016), MNRAS:Galaxy bias from the DES Science Verification data: combining galaxy density maps and weak lensing maps
• Cowperthwaite et al. (2016), ApJL, 826, L29:A DECam Search for an Optical Counterpart to the LIGO Gravitational-wave Event GW151226
• Crocce et al. (2016), MNRAS, 455, 4301:Galaxy clustering, photometric redshifts and diagnosis of systematics in the DES Science Verification data
• Gerdes et al. (2016), AJ, 151, 39:Observation of Two New L4 Neptune Trojans in the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Fields
• Giannantonio et al. (2016), MNRAS, 456, 3213:CMB lensing tomography with the DES Science Verification galaxies
• Gruen et al. (2016), MNRAS, 455, 3367:Weak lensing by galaxy troughs in DES Science Verification data
• Jarvis et al. (2016), MNRAS:The DES Science Verification Weak Lensing Shear Catalogues
• Kacprzak et al. (2016), MNRAS, 463, 3653:Cosmology constraints from shear peak statistics in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
• Kirk et al. (2016), MNRAS, 459, 21:Cross-correlation of gravitational lensing from DES Science Verification data with SPT and Planck lensing
• Luque et al. (2016), MNRAS, 458. 603:Digging deeper into the Southern skies: a compact Milky-Way companion discovered in first-year Dark Energy Survey data
• Li et al. (2016), ApJ, 817, 135:Discovery of a Stellar Overdensity in Eridanus-Phoenix in the Dark Energy Survey
• Li et al. (2016), AJ, 151, id.157:Assessment of Systematic Chromatic Errors that Impact Sub-1% Photometric Precision in Large-area Sky Surveys
• Melchior et al. (2016), Astronomy and Computing, 16, 99:Crowdsourcing quality control for Dark Energy Survey images
• Nord et al. (2016), ApJ, 827, id.51:Observation and Confirmation of Six Strong-lensing Systems in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification Data
• Palmese et al. (2016), MNRAS, in press:Comparing Dark Energy Survey and HST-CLASH observations of the galaxy cluster RXC J2248.7-4431: implications for stellar mass versus dark matter
• Pieres et al. (2016), MNRAS, 461, 519:Physical properties of star clusters in the outer LMC as observed by the DES
• Rozo et al. (2016), MNRAS, 461, 1431:redMaGiC: selecting luminous red galaxies from the DES Science Verification data
• Rykoff et al. (2016), ApJSS, 224, 1:The RedMaPPer Galaxy Cluster Catalog From DES Science Verification Data
• Soares-Santos et al. (2016), ApJL, 823, L33:A Dark Energy Camera Search for an Optical Counterpart to the First Advanced LIGO Gravitational Wave Event GW150914
• Soergel et al. (2016), MNRAS, 461, 3172:Detection of the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect with DES Year 1 and SPT
• Suchyta et al. (2016), MNRAS, 457, 786:No galaxy left behind: accurate measurements with the faintest objects in the Dark Energy Survey
• Smith et al. (2016), ApJ, 818, L8:DES14X3taz: A Type I Superluminous Supernova Showing a Luminous, Rapidly Cooling Initial Pre-peak Bump
• Zhang et al. (2016), ApJ, 816, 98:Galaxies in X-Ray Selected Clusters and Groups in Dark Energy Survey Data. I. Stellar Mass Growth of Bright Central Galaxies since z~1.2

2015

Community papers:

• Bonifacio et al. (2015), A&A, 579, L6:Chemical abundances of giant stars in the Crater stellar system
• Grillmair et al. (2015), ApJ, 812, 26:An Orphan No Longer? Detection of the Southern Orphan Stream and a Candidate Progenitor
• Kim et al. (2015), ApJL, 804, id.L44:A Hero's Dark Horse: Discovery of an Ultra-faint Milky Way Satellite in Pegasus
• Kim et al. (2015), ApJ, 796, 871:Discovery of a Faint Outer Halo Milky Way Star Cluster in the Southern Sky
• Kim & Jerjen (2015), ApJ, 799, id.73:A Hero's Little Horse: Discovery of a Dissolving Star Cluster in Pegasus
• Kim & Jerjen (2015), ApJL, 808, id.l39:Horologium II: A Second Ultra-faint Milky Way Satellite in the Horologium Constellation
• Kirby et al. (2015), ApJ, 810, 56:Spectroscopic Confirmation of the Dwarf Galaxies Hydra II and Pisces II and the Globular Cluster Laevens 1
• Koposov et al. (2015), ApJ, 805, id.130:Beasts of the Southern Wild : Discovery of nine Ultra Faint satellites in the vicinity of the Magellanic Clouds
• Martin et al. (2015), ApJL, 804, id.L5:Hydra II: A Faint and Compact Milky Way Dwarf Galaxy Found in the Survey of the Magellanic Stellar History
• McCleary et al (2015), ApJ, 805, id.40:Mass Substructure in Abell 3128
• Muñoz et al. (2015), ApJ, 813, L15:Unveiling a Rich System of Faint Dwarf Galaxies in the Next Generation Fornax Survey
• Muller et al. (2015), A&A, 583, 79:New dwarf galaxy candidates in the Centaurus group
• Nugent et al. (2015), ApJ, 814, 117:NEOWISE Reactivation Mission Year One: Preliminary Asteroid Diameters and Albedos
• Roderick et al. (2015), ApJ, 804, id.134:Stellar Substructures Around the Hercules Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy
• Romani (2015), ApJL, 812, L24:A Likely Millisecond Pulsar Binary Counterpart for Fermi Source 2FGL J2039.6-5620
• Sand et al. (2015), ApJ, 812, L13:Antlia B: A Faint Dwarf Galaxy Member of the NGC 3109 Association
• Sheppard & Trujillo (2015), AJ, 149, id.44:Discovery and Characteristics of the Rapidly Rotating Active Asteroid (62412) 2000 SY178 in the Main Belt
• Wu et al. (2015), MNRAS, 448, 1900:Gemini spectroscopy of Galactic Bulge Sources: a population of hidden accreting binaries revealed?

Dark Energy Survey Collaboration papers:

• Agnello et al. (2015), MNRAS, 454, 1260:Discovery of two gravitationally lensed quasars in the Dark Energy Survey
• Balbinot et al. (2015), MNRAS, 449, 1129:The LMC geometry and outer stellar populations from early DES data
• Banerji et al. (2015), MNRAS, 446, 2523:Combining Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data with near-infrared data from the ESO VISTA Hemisphere Survey
• Bechtol et al. (2015), ApJ, 807, 50:Eight New Milky Way Companions Discovered in First-year Dark Energy Survey Data
• Chang et al. (2015), ApJ, 801, 73:Modeling the Transfer Function for the Dark Energy Survey
• Chang et al. (2015), Physics Review Letters, 115, id.051301:Wide-Field Lensing Mass Maps from Dark Energy Survey Science Verification Data
• Drlica-Wagner et al. (2015), ApJ, 813, 109:Eight Ultra-faint Galaxy Candidates Discovered in Year Two of the Dark Energy Survey
• Drlica-Wagner et al. (2015), ApJ, 809, L4:Search for Gamma-Ray Emission from DES Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy Candidates with Fermi-LAT Data
• Flaugher et al. (2015), AJ, 150, 150:The Dark Energy Camera
• Goldstein et al. (2015), AJ, 150, 82:Automated Transient Identification in the Dark Energy Survey
• Kessler et al. (2015), AJ, 150, 172:The Difference Imaging Pipeline for the Transient Search in the Dark Energy Survey
• Melchior et al. (2015), MNRAS, 449, 2219:Mass and galaxy distributions of four massive galaxy clusters from Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
• Papadopoulos et al. (2015), MNRAS, 449, 1215:DES13S2cmm: the first superluminous supernova from the Dark Energy Survey
• Reed et al. (2015), MNRAS, 454, 3952:DES J0454-4448: discovery of the first luminous z ≥ 6  quasar from the Dark Energy Survey
• Saro et al. (2015), MNRAS, 454, 2305:Constraints on the richness-mass relation and the optical-SZE positional offset distribution for SZE-selected clusters
• Simon et al. (2015), ApJ, 808, 95:Stellar Kinematics and Metallicities in the Ultra-faint Dwarf Galaxy Reticulum II
• Vikram et al. (2015), Physics, Review Letters, 92, id.022006:Wide-field lensing mass maps from Dark Energy Survey science verification data: Methodology and detailed analysis
• Yuan et al. (2015), MNRAS, 452, 3047:OzDES multifibre spectroscopy for the Dark Energy Survey: first-year operation and results
• Zhang et al. (2015), PASP, 127, 1183:Crowded Cluster Cores: An Algorithm for Deblending in Dark Energy Survey Images

2014

Community papers:

• Bouy et al. (2014), A&A, 564, A29:Orion revisited. II. The foreground population to Orion A
• de Gasperin et al. (2014), A&A, 568, id.A107:Discovery of the supernova remnant G351.0-5.4
• McMonigal et al. (2014), MNRAS, 444, 3139:Sailing under the Magellanic Clouds: a DECam view of the Carina dwarf
• Prieto et al. (2014), ApJL, 787, L8:Light Echoes from eta Carinae's Great Eruption: Spectrophotometric Evolution and the Rapid Formation of Nitrogen-rich Molecules
• Trujillo & Sheppard (2014), Nature, 507, 471:A Sedna-like body with a perihelion of 80 astronomical units

Dark Energy Collaboration papers:

• Sánchez et al. (2014), MNRAS, 445, 1482:Photometric redshift analysis in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data